Employment equity

A DND/CAF culture that supports diversity, equity, and inclusion and is rooted in the DND and CF Code of Values and Ethics allows people to feel valued, respected, connected, psychologically safe, and empowered to bring their authentic selves to the workplace. This helps to enable operational effectiveness, as we look to reflect the population we serve.

Sentiment towards diversity, equity, and inclusion in DND/CAF

These questions are from the 2022 Your Say Matters (YSM) survey, an annual survey sent to all DND public service employees and CAF members, as well as the 2020-2021 and 2022-2023 Public Service Employee Survey (PSES), an annual survey sent to all DND public service employees. Note that only men and women are available as filtering options for gender; data for other gender identities is not shown as the numbers are below the established data threshold to protect privacy.

Defence Team

I agree that there is an atmosphere of acceptance in the CAF/DND:

category subcategory Year % Agree % Other
Overall Overall 2022 43% 57%
Gender All Men 2022 46% 54%
Gender All Women 2022 34% 66%
Gender DND public service employees Men 2022 42% 58%
Gender DND public service employees Women 2022 36% 64%
Gender Primary Reserve Men 2022 52% 48%
Gender Primary Reserve Women 2022 34% 66%
Gender Regular Force Men 2022 45% 55%
Gender Regular Force Women 2022 31% 69%
Component DND public service employees 2022 40% 60%
Component Primary Reserve 2022 47% 53%
Component Regular Force 2022 42% 58%
CAF Rank Overall Junior Non-Commissioned Member 2022 40% 60%
CAF Rank Overall Junior Officer 2022 43% 58%
CAF Rank Overall Senior Non-Commissioned Member 2022 46% 54%
CAF Rank Overall Senior Officer 2022 54% 46%
CAF Rank Primary Reserve Junior Non-Commissioned Member 2022 45% 55%
CAF Rank Primary Reserve Junior Officer 2022 44% 56%
CAF Rank Primary Reserve Senior Non-Commissioned Member 2022 40% 60%
CAF Rank Primary Reserve Senior Officer 2022 71% 29%
CAF Rank Regular Force Junior Non-Commissioned Member 2022 39% 61%
CAF Rank Regular Force Junior Officer 2022 42% 59%
CAF Rank Regular Force Senior Non-Commissioned Member 2022 49% 51%
CAF Rank Regular Force Senior Officer 2022 43% 57%

I agree that the CAF/DND's leadership has taken meaningful action to help the CAF/DND become a more diverse and inclusive place to work:

category subcategory Year % Agree % Other
Overall Overall 2022 52% 48%
Gender All Men 2022 53% 48%
Gender All Women 2022 53% 48%
Gender DND public service employees Men 2022 49% 51%
Gender DND public service employees Women 2022 53% 47%
Gender Primary Reserve Men 2022 57% 43%
Gender Primary Reserve Women 2022 56% 44%
Gender Regular Force Men 2022 52% 48%
Gender Regular Force Women 2022 50% 50%
Component DND public service employees 2022 50% 50%
Component Primary Reserve 2022 55% 45%
Component Regular Force 2022 52% 48%
CAF Rank Overall Junior Non-Commissioned Member 2022 47% 53%
CAF Rank Overall Junior Officer 2022 48% 53%
CAF Rank Overall Senior Non-Commissioned Member 2022 61% 39%
CAF Rank Overall Senior Officer 2022 64% 36%
CAF Rank Primary Reserve Junior Non-Commissioned Member 2022 50% 50%
CAF Rank Primary Reserve Junior Officer 2022 41% 59%
CAF Rank Primary Reserve Senior Non-Commissioned Member 2022 63% 37%
CAF Rank Primary Reserve Senior Officer 2022 73% 27%
CAF Rank Regular Force Junior Non-Commissioned Member 2022 47% 53%
CAF Rank Regular Force Junior Officer 2022 51% 49%
CAF Rank Regular Force Senior Non-Commissioned Member 2022 60% 40%
CAF Rank Regular Force Senior Officer 2022 58% 42%

Data Source: Your Say Matters: Defence Team Well-Being Survey (2022)

DND public service employees

In my work unit, every individual is accepted as an equal member of the team:

category subcategory Year % Agree % Other
Overall Overall 2020 71% 29%
Overall Overall 2022 73% 27%
Age 24 years and under 2020 82% 18%
Age 24 years and under 2022 82% 18%
Age 25-29 years 2020 79% 21%
Age 25-29 years 2022 77% 23%
Age 30-34 years 2020 76% 24%
Age 30-34 years 2022 76% 24%
Age 35-39 years 2020 72% 28%
Age 35-39 years 2022 73% 27%
Age 40-44 years 2020 73% 27%
Age 40-44 years 2022 73% 27%
Age 45-49 years 2020 68% 32%
Age 45-49 years 2022 73% 27%
Age 50-54 years 2020 68% 32%
Age 50-54 years 2022 72% 26%
Age 55-59 years 2020 69% 31%
Age 55-59 years 2022 70% 30%
Age 60 years and older 2020 72% 28%
Age 60 years and older 2022 75% 25%
Disability Persons with a disability (Total) 2020 60% 40%
Disability Persons with a disability (Total) 2022 63% 37%
Disability Persons without a disability 2020 72% 28%
Disability Persons without a disability 2022 76% 24%
First official language English 2020 68% 32%
First official language English 2022 70% 30%
First official language French 2020 78% 22%
First official language French 2022 81% 19%
Gender Another gender 2020 78% 22%
Gender Another gender 2022 70% 30%
Gender Man 2020 72% 28%
Gender Man 2022 74% 26%
Gender Woman 2020 70% 30%
Gender Woman 2022 74% 26%
Indigenous Indigenous people 2020 62% 38%
Indigenous Indigenous people 2022 65% 35%
Indigenous Non-Indigenous people 2020 71% 29%
Indigenous Non-Indigenous people 2022 74% 26%
Province/territory of work Alberta 2020 62% 38%
Province/territory of work Alberta 2022 63% 37%
Province/territory of work British Columbia 2020 66% 34%
Province/territory of work British Columbia 2022 64% 36%
Province/territory of work Manitoba 2020 62% 38%
Province/territory of work Manitoba 2022 63% 37%
Province/territory of work National Capital Region 2020 79% 21%
Province/territory of work National Capital Region 2022 82% 18%
Province/territory of work New Brunswick 2020 62% 38%
Province/territory of work New Brunswick 2022 66% 34%
Province/territory of work Newfoundland and Labrador 2020 62% 38%
Province/territory of work Newfoundland and Labrador 2022 69% 31%
Province/territory of work Northwest Territories 2020 72% 28%
Province/territory of work Northwest Territories 2022 82% 18%
Province/territory of work Nova Scotia 2020 64% 36%
Province/territory of work Nova Scotia 2022 63% 37%
Province/territory of work Ontario (excluding National Capital Region) 2020 64% 36%
Province/territory of work Ontario (excluding National Capital Region) 2022 65% 35%
Province/territory of work Outside of Canada 2020 86% 14%
Province/territory of work Outside of Canada 2022 83% 17%
Province/territory of work Quebec (excluding National Capital Region) 2020 76% 24%
Province/territory of work Quebec (excluding National Capital Region) 2022 79% 21%
Province/territory of work Saskatchewan 2020 73% 27%
Province/territory of work Saskatchewan 2022 65% 35%
Racialized group Non-racialized, non-Indigenous people population 2022 74% 26%
Racialized group Racialized, non-Indigenous people population 2022 77% 23%
Sexual orientation Does not identify as 2SLGBTQIA+ 2022 74% 26%
Sexual orientation Identifies as 2SLGBTQIA+ 2022 69% 31%

Data Sources: Public Service Employee Survey (2020-2022)

More Information: Gender-Based Analysis (GBA) Plus

Context

GBA Plus is the Government of Canada’s tool for applying intersectional analysis. Intersectional analysis examines how multiple, diverse identify factors interact and affect people’s experiences of policy, programs, services, initiatives and operations.

The information and knowledge gathered from intersectional analysis informs and shapes how policy, programs, initiatives, and operations are developed and implemented. This ensures they are inclusive and barrier-free to people with specific intersectional identities. In this way, GBA Plus/intersectional analysis enables the DND/CAF to better understand the composition of its members and those it serves, what needs there are, and how best to meet those needs. Learn more about Gender-Based Analysis Plus at National Defence.

Gender-Based Analysis (GBA) Plus is a decision-making tool that supports inclusivity. GBA Plus ensures that leaders and personnel can make policies, programs, operations and initiatives responsive to changes in culture.

The early, complete, and routine use of GBA Plus is an important step in culture evolution. Its conclusions can inform decisions made by leaders to improve culture. This process helps to prevent systematic harm and discrimination, increasing operational effectiveness.

GBA Plus enables a rigorous process for understanding who is impacted by the issue or opportunity being addressed by the initiative, identifying how the initiative could be tailored to meet diverse needs of the people most impacted, and anticipating and mitigating any barriers to accessing or benefitting from the initiative.

Intersectionality is the interaction between layers of power and privilege and its impact on culture. By using an intersectional perspective, gaps in legal and institutional systems can be acknowledged and addressed for individuals and groups. GBA Plus provides intersectional perspective to the Defence Team to address systemic inequities. GBA Plus is more than a gender analysis tool. It helps decision-makers to consider the intersecting effects of many factors: age, ability, education, ethnicity, economic status, location, and sexual orientation.

Recent actions

The Defence Team continues to implement and refine policies aimed at creating an inclusive environment. Some key initiatives currently underway include

DND/CAF is working towards effectively implementing GBA Plus. This includes a commitment to monitoring and accountability. Teams can independently apply GBA Plus to their operations to create a diverse, inclusive and cohesive workplace.

CPCC has co-developed the GBA Plus Enterprise Approach. This approach is a departmental-level framework that describes standards and objectives for the GBA Plus program. The intent of the framework is to integrate GBA Plus fully and concretely as an analytical tool to inform decision-making across the Defence Team.

Employment equity groups in the Defence Team

Women, Indigenous people, persons with disabilities, and members of racialized groups are the four recognized Employment Equity Groups, as per the Employment Equity Act. The graphs below represent the current representation for three out of the four employment equity groups at DND/CAF. Representation rates for persons with disabilities in the CAF can be found on the Accessibility page. Note that individuals belonging to more than one employment equity group will be counted in each group.

Type Percentage Personnel who identify as a woman Personnel who identify as a member of a racialized group Personnel who identify as Indigenous
CAF member % Agree 16.4% 11.1% 2.9%
CAF member % Other 83.6% 88.9% 97.1%
DND public service employees % Agree 41.3% 10.0% 3.4%
DND public service employees % Other 58.7% 90.0% 96.6%

Data Sources: CAF Employment Equity Report (2021/2022)

Open Government Portal - National Defence

Civilians' Workplace Representation (Last Updated: 2022)

Canadian public sentiment towards employment equity groups

These metrics are taken from the 2022-2023 Views of the CAF Tracking Study, a public opinion research tracking study that DND commissions annually. This study is conducted among the general Canadian population, 18 years of age and older.

Canadian public

category subcategory Year Percentage The Canadian Armed Forces is as good a career choice for women as it is for men
Overall Overall 2022 % Agree 56%
Overall Overall 2022 % Other 44%
Overall Overall 2023 % Agree 58%
Overall Overall 2023 % Other 42%
Age 18-24 2022 % Agree 56%
Age 18-24 2022 % Other 44%
Age 18-24 2023 % Agree 48%
Age 18-24 2023 % Other 52%
Age 25-34 2022 % Agree 60%
Age 25-34 2022 % Other 40%
Age 25-34 2023 % Agree 62%
Age 25-34 2023 % Other 38%
Age 35-44 2022 % Agree 50%
Age 35-44 2022 % Other 50%
Age 35-44 2023 % Agree 57%
Age 35-44 2023 % Other 43%
Age 45-54 2022 % Agree 60%
Age 45-54 2022 % Other 40%
Age 45-54 2023 % Agree 56%
Age 45-54 2023 % Other 44%
Age 55-64 2022 % Agree 59%
Age 55-64 2022 % Other 41%
Age 55-64 2023 % Agree 61%
Age 55-64 2023 % Other 39%
Age 65+ 2022 % Agree 51%
Age 65+ 2022 % Other 49%
Age 65+ 2023 % Agree 59%
Age 65+ 2023 % Other 41%
Education College/CEGEP 2022 % Agree 59%
Education College/CEGEP 2022 % Other 41%
Education College/CEGEP 2023 % Agree 64%
Education College/CEGEP 2023 % Other 36%
Education Currently a student 2023 % Agree 37%
Education Currently a student 2023 % Other 63%
Education High School 2022 % Agree 66%
Education High School 2022 % Other 34%
Education High School 2023 % Agree 65%
Education High School 2023 % Other 35%
Education University 2022 % Agree 49%
Education University 2022 % Other 51%
Education University 2023 % Agree 52%
Education University 2023 % Other 48%
Gender Another Gender 2022 % Agree 19%
Gender Another Gender 2022 % Other 81%
Gender Another Gender 2023 % Agree 25%
Gender Another Gender 2023 % Other 75%
Gender Men 2022 % Agree 61%
Gender Men 2022 % Other 39%
Gender Men 2023 % Agree 63%
Gender Men 2023 % Other 37%
Gender Women 2022 % Agree 51%
Gender Women 2022 % Other 49%
Gender Women 2023 % Agree 53%
Gender Women 2023 % Other 47%
Race Asian 2022 % Agree 61%
Race Asian 2022 % Other 39%
Race Asian 2023 % Agree 61%
Race Asian 2023 % Other 39%
Race Black 2022 % Agree 79%
Race Black 2022 % Other 21%
Race Black 2023 % Agree 61%
Race Black 2023 % Other 39%
Race Chinese 2022 % Agree 53%
Race Chinese 2022 % Other 47%
Race Chinese 2023 % Agree 42%
Race Chinese 2023 % Other 58%
Race Indigenous 2022 % Agree 64%
Race Indigenous 2022 % Other 36%
Race Indigenous 2023 % Agree 70%
Race Indigenous 2023 % Other 30%
Race Other 2022 % Agree 62%
Race Other 2022 % Other 38%
Race Other 2023 % Agree 62%
Race Other 2023 % Other 38%
Race White 2022 % Agree 54%
Race White 2022 % Other 46%
Race White 2023 % Agree 57%
Race White 2023 % Other 43%
Region Alberta/Northwest Territories 2022 % Agree 56%
Region Alberta/Northwest Territories 2022 % Other 44%
Region Alberta/Northwest Territories 2023 % Agree 57%
Region Alberta/Northwest Territories 2023 % Other 43%
Region Atlantic Canada 2022 % Agree 65%
Region Atlantic Canada 2022 % Other 35%
Region Atlantic Canada 2023 % Agree 56%
Region Atlantic Canada 2023 % Other 44%
Region British Columbia/Yukon 2022 % Agree 52%
Region British Columbia/Yukon 2022 % Other 48%
Region British Columbia/Yukon 2023 % Agree 55%
Region British Columbia/Yukon 2023 % Other 45%
Region Manitoba/Saskatchewan 2022 % Agree 61%
Region Manitoba/Saskatchewan 2022 % Other 39%
Region Manitoba/Saskatchewan 2023 % Agree 64%
Region Manitoba/Saskatchewan 2023 % Other 36%
Region Ontario/Nuliut 2022 % Agree 50%
Region Ontario/Nuliut 2022 % Other 50%
Region Ontario/Nuliut 2023 % Agree 53%
Region Ontario/Nuliut 2023 % Other 47%
Region Quebec 2022 % Agree 63%
Region Quebec 2022 % Other 37%
Region Quebec 2023 % Agree 67%
Region Quebec 2023 % Other 33%

Data Sources: Views of the CAF Tracking Study (2022-2023)

category subcategory Year Percentage The Canadian Armed Forces workplace environment is respectful of women
Overall Overall 2022 % Agree 36%
Overall Overall 2022 % Other 64%
Overall Overall 2023 % Agree 39%
Overall Overall 2023 % Other 61%
Age 18-24 2022 % Agree 43%
Age 18-24 2022 % Other 57%
Age 18-24 2023 % Agree 44%
Age 18-24 2023 % Other 56%
Age 25-34 2022 % Agree 47%
Age 25-34 2022 % Other 53%
Age 25-34 2023 % Agree 47%
Age 25-34 2023 % Other 53%
Age 35-44 2022 % Agree 34%
Age 35-44 2022 % Other 66%
Age 35-44 2023 % Agree 40%
Age 35-44 2023 % Other 60%
Age 45-54 2022 % Agree 38%
Age 45-54 2022 % Other 62%
Age 45-54 2023 % Agree 39%
Age 45-54 2023 % Other 61%
Age 55-64 2022 % Agree 28%
Age 55-64 2022 % Other 72%
Age 55-64 2023 % Agree 33%
Age 55-64 2023 % Other 67%
Age 65+ 2022 % Agree 30%
Age 65+ 2022 % Other 70%
Age 65+ 2023 % Agree 35%
Age 65+ 2023 % Other 65%
Education College/CEGEP 2022 % Agree 35%
Education College/CEGEP 2022 % Other 65%
Education College/CEGEP 2023 % Agree 41%
Education College/CEGEP 2023 % Other 59%
Education Currently a student 2023 % Agree 27%
Education Currently a student 2023 % Other 73%
Education High School 2022 % Agree 45%
Education High School 2022 % Other 55%
Education High School 2023 % Agree 45%
Education High School 2023 % Other 55%
Education University 2022 % Agree 32%
Education University 2022 % Other 68%
Education University 2023 % Agree 36%
Education University 2023 % Other 64%
Gender Another Gender 2022 % Agree 37%
Gender Another Gender 2022 % Other 63%
Gender Another Gender 2023 % Agree 10%
Gender Another Gender 2023 % Other 90%
Gender Men 2022 % Agree 43%
Gender Men 2022 % Other 57%
Gender Men 2023 % Agree 48%
Gender Men 2023 % Other 52%
Gender Women 2022 % Agree 29%
Gender Women 2022 % Other 71%
Gender Women 2023 % Agree 32%
Gender Women 2023 % Other 68%
Race Asian 2022 % Agree 54%
Race Asian 2022 % Other 46%
Race Asian 2023 % Agree 56%
Race Asian 2023 % Other 44%
Race Black 2022 % Agree 49%
Race Black 2022 % Other 51%
Race Black 2023 % Agree 59%
Race Black 2023 % Other 41%
Race Chinese 2022 % Agree 33%
Race Chinese 2022 % Other 67%
Race Chinese 2023 % Agree 34%
Race Chinese 2023 % Other 66%
Race Indigenous 2022 % Agree 45%
Race Indigenous 2022 % Other 55%
Race Indigenous 2023 % Agree 51%
Race Indigenous 2023 % Other 49%
Race Other 2022 % Agree 49%
Race Other 2022 % Other 51%
Race Other 2023 % Agree 51%
Race Other 2023 % Other 49%
Race White 2022 % Agree 32%
Race White 2022 % Other 68%
Race White 2023 % Agree 36%
Race White 2023 % Other 64%
Region Alberta/Northwest Territories 2022 % Agree 40%
Region Alberta/Northwest Territories 2022 % Other 60%
Region Alberta/Northwest Territories 2023 % Agree 42%
Region Alberta/Northwest Territories 2023 % Other 58%
Region Atlantic Canada 2022 % Agree 42%
Region Atlantic Canada 2022 % Other 58%
Region Atlantic Canada 2023 % Agree 43%
Region Atlantic Canada 2023 % Other 57%
Region British Columbia/Yukon 2022 % Agree 34%
Region British Columbia/Yukon 2022 % Other 66%
Region British Columbia/Yukon 2023 % Agree 38%
Region British Columbia/Yukon 2023 % Other 62%
Region Manitoba/Saskatchewan 2022 % Agree 41%
Region Manitoba/Saskatchewan 2022 % Other 59%
Region Manitoba/Saskatchewan 2023 % Agree 43%
Region Manitoba/Saskatchewan 2023 % Other 57%
Region Ontario/Nuliut 2022 % Agree 32%
Region Ontario/Nuliut 2022 % Other 68%
Region Ontario/Nuliut 2023 % Agree 38%
Region Ontario/Nuliut 2023 % Other 62%
Region Quebec 2022 % Agree 38%
Region Quebec 2022 % Other 62%
Region Quebec 2023 % Agree 38%
Region Quebec 2023 % Other 62%

Data Sources: Views of the CAF Tracking Study (2022-2023)

category subcategory Year Percentage The Canadian Armed Forces is as good a career choice for visible minorities as it is for anyone else
Overall Overall 2022 % Agree 60%
Overall Overall 2022 % Other 40%
Overall Overall 2023 % Agree 63%
Overall Overall 2023 % Other 37%
Age 18-24 2022 % Agree 57%
Age 18-24 2022 % Other 43%
Age 18-24 2023 % Agree 56%
Age 18-24 2023 % Other 44%
Age 25-34 2022 % Agree 62%
Age 25-34 2022 % Other 38%
Age 25-34 2023 % Agree 62%
Age 25-34 2023 % Other 38%
Age 35-44 2022 % Agree 56%
Age 35-44 2022 % Other 44%
Age 35-44 2023 % Agree 59%
Age 35-44 2023 % Other 41%
Age 45-54 2022 % Agree 62%
Age 45-54 2022 % Other 38%
Age 45-54 2023 % Agree 61%
Age 45-54 2023 % Other 39%
Age 55-64 2022 % Agree 62%
Age 55-64 2022 % Other 38%
Age 55-64 2023 % Agree 65%
Age 55-64 2023 % Other 35%
Age 65+ 2022 % Agree 58%
Age 65+ 2022 % Other 42%
Age 65+ 2023 % Agree 68%
Age 65+ 2023 % Other 32%
Education College/CEGEP 2022 % Agree 64%
Education College/CEGEP 2022 % Other 36%
Education College/CEGEP 2023 % Agree 69%
Education College/CEGEP 2023 % Other 31%
Education Currently a student 2023 % Agree 32%
Education Currently a student 2023 % Other 68%
Education High School 2022 % Agree 61%
Education High School 2022 % Other 39%
Education High School 2023 % Agree 69%
Education High School 2023 % Other 31%
Education University 2022 % Agree 57%
Education University 2022 % Other 43%
Education University 2023 % Agree 58%
Education University 2023 % Other 42%
Gender Another Gender 2022 % Agree 37%
Gender Another Gender 2022 % Other 63%
Gender Another Gender 2023 % Agree 76%
Gender Another Gender 2023 % Other 24%
Gender Men 2022 % Agree 64%
Gender Men 2022 % Other 36%
Gender Men 2023 % Agree 72%
Gender Men 2023 % Other 28%
Gender Women 2022 % Agree 55%
Gender Women 2022 % Other 45%
Gender Women 2023 % Agree 54%
Gender Women 2023 % Other 46%
Race Asian 2022 % Agree 66%
Race Asian 2022 % Other 34%
Race Asian 2023 % Agree 61%
Race Asian 2023 % Other 39%
Race Black 2022 % Agree 63%
Race Black 2022 % Other 37%
Race Black 2023 % Agree 69%
Race Black 2023 % Other 31%
Race Chinese 2022 % Agree 50%
Race Chinese 2022 % Other 50%
Race Chinese 2023 % Agree 46%
Race Chinese 2023 % Other 54%
Race Indigenous 2022 % Agree 66%
Race Indigenous 2022 % Other 34%
Race Indigenous 2023 % Agree 58%
Race Indigenous 2023 % Other 42%
Race Other 2022 % Agree 53%
Race Other 2022 % Other 47%
Race Other 2023 % Agree 67%
Race Other 2023 % Other 33%
Race White 2022 % Agree 59%
Race White 2022 % Other 41%
Race White 2023 % Agree 64%
Race White 2023 % Other 36%
Region Alberta/Northwest Territories 2022 % Agree 63%
Region Alberta/Northwest Territories 2022 % Other 37%
Region Alberta/Northwest Territories 2023 % Agree 63%
Region Alberta/Northwest Territories 2023 % Other 37%
Region Atlantic Canada 2022 % Agree 62%
Region Atlantic Canada 2022 % Other 38%
Region Atlantic Canada 2023 % Agree 68%
Region Atlantic Canada 2023 % Other 32%
Region British Columbia/Yukon 2022 % Agree 55%
Region British Columbia/Yukon 2022 % Other 45%
Region British Columbia/Yukon 2023 % Agree 59%
Region British Columbia/Yukon 2023 % Other 41%
Region Manitoba/Saskatchewan 2022 % Agree 59%
Region Manitoba/Saskatchewan 2022 % Other 41%
Region Manitoba/Saskatchewan 2023 % Agree 65%
Region Manitoba/Saskatchewan 2023 % Other 35%
Region Ontario/Nuliut 2022 % Agree 54%
Region Ontario/Nuliut 2022 % Other 46%
Region Ontario/Nuliut 2023 % Agree 57%
Region Ontario/Nuliut 2023 % Other 43%
Region Quebec 2022 % Agree 69%
Region Quebec 2022 % Other 31%
Region Quebec 2023 % Agree 72%
Region Quebec 2023 % Other 28%

Data Sources: Views of the CAF Tracking Study (2022-2023)

CAF employment equity group representation

Representation rates, as outlined in the CAF Employment Equity reports, are provided for women, Indigenous people, and members of racialized groups, as a percentage of the total CAF population. These goals are based on the CAF Commitment: Employment Equity Plan 2021-2026.

Representation in the CAF

Component Year Indigenous people Member of racialized groups Women
Regular Force and Primary Reserve 2017 3% 8% 15%
Regular Force and Primary Reserve 2018 3% 9% 16%
Regular Force and Primary Reserve 2019 3% 9% 16%
Regular Force and Primary Reserve 2020 3% 10% 16%
Regular Force and Primary Reserve 2021 3% 11% 16%
Primary Reserve 2017 3% 11% 16%
Primary Reserve 2018 3% 12% 16%
Primary Reserve 2019 3% 11% 17%
Primary Reserve 2020 3% 11% 17%
Primary Reserve 2021 3% 13% 17%
Regular Force 2017 3% 7% 15%
Regular Force 2018 3% 8% 15%
Regular Force 2019 3% 9% 16%
Regular Force 2020 3% 9% 16%
Regular Force 2021 3% 10% 16%

Data Sources: CAF Employment Equity Report (2021/2022)

CAF employment equity group representation goals

This data shows the annual enrolment of women, Indigenous people, and members of racialized groups, as a percentage of the total CAF enrolment for each year. The 2026 target rate or goal for each group is also represented on each graph.

Component Year Indigenous people Member of racialized groups Women
Regular Force and Primary Reserve 2017 3% 8% 15%
Regular Force and Primary Reserve 2018 3% 9% 16%
Regular Force and Primary Reserve 2019 3% 9% 16%
Regular Force and Primary Reserve 2020 3% 10% 16%
Regular Force and Primary Reserve 2021 3% 11% 16%
Primary Reserve 2017 3% 11% 16%
Primary Reserve 2018 3% 12% 16%
Primary Reserve 2019 3% 11% 17%
Primary Reserve 2020 3% 11% 17%
Primary Reserve 2021 3% 13% 17%
Regular Force 2017 3% 7% 15%
Regular Force 2018 3% 8% 15%
Regular Force 2019 3% 9% 16%
Regular Force 2020 3% 9% 16%
Regular Force 2021 3% 10% 16%

Data Sources: CAF Employment Equity Report (2021/2022)

Sexual orientation and gender identity

Canadian public sentiment towards sexual orientation

The Canadian Armed Forces is as good a career choice for people in the LGBTQ2+ community as it is for anyone else:

category subcategory Year % Agree % Other
Overall Overall 2023 41% 59%
Age 18-24 2023 40% 60%
Age 25-34 2023 42% 58%
Age 35-44 2023 45% 55%
Age 45-54 2023 41% 59%
Age 55-64 2023 37% 63%
Age 65+ 2023 40% 60%
Education College/CEGEP 2023 45% 55%
Education Currently a student 2023 25% 75%
Education High School 2023 47% 53%
Education University 2023 36% 64%
Gender Another Gender 2023 32% 68%
Gender Men 2023 45% 55%
Gender Women 2023 37% 63%
Race Asian 2023 43% 57%
Race Black 2023 50% 50%
Race Chinese 2023 29% 71%
Race Indigenous 2023 53% 47%
Race Other 2023 49% 51%
Race White 2023 40% 60%
Region Alberta/Northwest Territories 2022 32% 68%
Region Atlantic Canada 2023 42% 58%
Region British Columbia/Yukon 2023 40% 60%
Region Manitoba/Saskatchewan 2023 43% 57%
Region Ontario/Nuliut 2023 36% 64%
Region Quebec 2023 52% 48%

Data Sources: Views of the CAF Tracking Study (2022-2023)

Current gaps in gender and sexual orientation reporting

Gender refers to an individual's personal and social identity as a man, woman, or gender diverse (e.g., non-binary person: a person who is not exclusively a man or a woman). There are currently data gaps with reporting, as only two genders are listed for most internal DND/CAF surveys and systems. DND/CAF employees and members are also not required to self-report their sexual orientation. While it would be helpful to examine survey results for only those identifying as part of the 2SLGBTQI+ community, this is not possible at this time. DND/CAF is currently implementing a self-identification survey for all DND public service employees and is developing a GBA Plus Enterprise Approach to address gender gaps.

More Information: 2SLGBTQI + Action Plan

Context

The Federal 2SLGBTQI+ Action Plan promotes equality for 2SLGBTQI+ people, the protection of their rights, and community action. The Action Plan and initiatives are based on an extensive engagement process with 2SLGBQTI+ community members, organizations, advocates, and experts. The plan calls on all departments to strengthen 2SLGBTQI+ inclusion in federal workplaces and take action to ensure that nothing like the LGBT Purge happens again.

Recent actions

The Action Plan includes several new initiatives to be implemented over the next five years, organized in six priority areas: 1) prioritize and sustain 2SLGBTQI+ community action, 2) continue to advance and strengthen 2SLGBTQI+ rights at home and abroad, 3) support Indigenous 2SLGBTQI+ resilience and resurgence, 4) engage everyone in Canada in fostering a 2SLGBTQI+ inclusive future, 5) strengthen 2SLGBTQI+ data and evidence-based policy making, and 6) embed 2SLGBTQI+ issues in the work of the Government of Canada.

Data sources

For details on the methodology of data analysis, including descriptions of each data source, please visit the list of data sources page.

Page details

Date modified: