Sexual Misconduct Incidents

Responses to the Survey on Sexual Misconduct in the Canadian Armed Forces (SSMCAF)

CAF members witnessing or experiencing sexualized or discriminatory behaviour

This table shows the 2022 SSMCAF responses. This survey tracks the prevalence and nature of self-reported sexual misconduct within the military workplace and/or involving military members, Department of National Defence (DND) employees, or DND contractors within or outside the military workplace. To access confidential support from the Sexual Misconduct Support and Resource Centre (SMSRC), call 1-844-750-1648.

I have experienced or witnessed sexualized or discriminatory behaviour in the past 12 months:

Year % Agree % Other
2022 67% 33%

Data Source: Survey on Sexual Misconduct in the Canadian Armed Forces (2022)

Response to witnessing sexual misconduct

In the SSMCAF survey, CAF Regular Force members were asked to disclose whether they had witnessed: 1) inappropriate verbal or non-verbal communication, 2) sexually explicit materials, physical contact, or suggested sexual relations, and/or 3) discrimination on the basis of sex, gender, sexual orientation, or gender identity. The data below shows the percentage of members who witnessed each behaviour type in the prior 12 months and whether they took action (at least once) or did not take action (at least once).

Type of Action Taken Discrimination on the basis of sex, gender, sexual orientation, or gender identity Inappropriate verbal or non-verbal communication Sexually explicit materials, physical contact, or suggested sexual relations
Action not taken 70% 80% 70%
Action taken 56% 54% 51%

Data Source: Survey on Sexual Misconduct in the Canadian Armed Forces (2022)

Sexual misconduct CAF incident reporting

DND/CAF uses the Sexual Misconduct Incident Tracking System (SMITS) to track reported incidents of sexual misconduct in the CAF. This section only includes data after April 1, 2016, which is when internal organizations were directed to begin tracking reports of sexual misconduct incidents. Currently, no similar system exists for DND public service employees.

Sexual misconduct reported cases by incident type

Note: the year indicates the year in which the incident was reported, which may differ from the year the incident occurred. A "completed" status means the case is ready to be reviewed for closure given that the case fields have met the minimum requirements. A "closed" status means the case is closed in the system.

Status Compaint Type Themes 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
All Discriminatory behaviours 22 18 13 N/A 11
All Involving minors 13 12 N/A 14 14
All Sexual assault 180 144 225 194 134
All Sexualized behaviours 245 216 285 224 191
Closed Discriminatory behaviours 22 18 13 N/A N/A
Closed Involving minors 13 12 N/A N/A N/A
Closed Sexual assault 169 104 111 86 17
Closed Sexualized behaviours 245 181 197 138 57
Completed Sexualized behaviours N/A 13 11 N/A N/A
Open Discriminatory behaviours N/A N/A N/A N/A 11
Open Involving minors N/A N/A N/A 14 14
Open Sexual assault 11 40 114 108 117
Open Sexualized behaviours N/A 22 77 86 134

Data Sources: Sexual Misconduct incident Tracking System (Last Updated: 2023/12/04)

Total incidents (2022) by internal organization

The number of personnel in the internal organization, Canadian Joint Operations Command (CJOC), is not shown here. While there are incidents that are reported while an individual is with CJOC, this internal organization represents personnel who join temporarily for deployment purposes, having come from another originating team. For this reason, the size of the CJOC is not shown as a fixed number.

Note: only internal organizations with incidents in 2022 are listed in this chart. Counts of less than 10 incidents have been grouped into "Other internal orgs”.

Internal organizations Number of CAF members Incidents
Canadian Army 40.7K 195
Chief of Military Personnel 11.8K 91
Royal Canadian Navy 12.3K 81
Royal Canadian Air Force 14.9K 47
Canadian Joint Operations Command N/A 21
Other internal orgs. 5.2K 12
Vice Chief of Defence Staff 3.1K 12

Data Sources: Sexual Misconduct Incident Tracking System (Last Updated: 2023/12/04)

Time between incident and reporting

This table illustrates the average number of days between when an incident of sexual misconduct occurred and when the incident was reported. Note that a shorter time may demonstrate that CAF members feel psychologically safe to report the incident right away.

Complaint type Incident Date Average # of days
All 2019 119
All 2020 118
All 2021 62
All 2022 47
All 2023 16
Discriminatory behaviours 2019 22
Discriminatory behaviours 2020 85
Discriminatory behaviours 2021 26
Discriminatory behaviours 2022 44
Discriminatory behaviours 2023 25
Involving minors 2019 100
Involving minors 2020 221
Involving minors 2021 166
Involving minors 2022 83
Involving minors 2023 9
Sexual assault 2019 182
Sexual assault 2020 128
Sexual assault 2021 70
Sexual assault 2022 39
Sexual assault 2023 14
Sexualized behaviours 2019 84
Sexualized behaviours 2020 106
Sexualized behaviours 2021 56
Sexualized behaviours 2022 51
Sexualized behaviours 2023 16

Data Sources: Sexual Misconduct Incident Tracking System (Last Updated: 2023/12/04)

Sexual misconduct training

Sentiment towards sexual misconduct training

This data is from the 2022 Survey on Sexual Misconduct in the CAF. DND/CAF is committed to providing training and educational materials about sexual misconduct, including presentations, discussion material, educational material, and workshops.

CAF members

Information about how to report sexual misconduct is promoted and shared in my unit:

category subcategory Year % Agree % Other
Overall Overall 2022 81% 19%
Men Experienced sexualized or discriminatory behaviours 2022 73% 27%
Men Overall 2022 83% 17%
Men Victim of sexual assault 2022 59% 41%
Women Experienced sexualized or discriminatory behaviours 2022 55% 45%
Women Overall 2022 70% 30%
Women Victim of sexual assault 2022 45% 55%

Data Source: Survey on Sexual Misconduct in the Canadian Armed Forces (2022)

Sexual misconduct support services

CAF member sentiment towards sexual misconduct support services

This data is from the 2022 Your Say Matters survey. The Sexual Misconduct Support and Resource Centre (SMSRC), provides support services to currently serving and former CAF members and DND public service employees who are affected by sexual misconduct. To access confidential support from the SMSRC toll-free in North America, call 1-844-750-1648.

CAF members

I would know where to go to get help if I experienced sexual misconduct:

category subcategory Year % Agree % Other
Overall Overall 2021 73% 27%
Gender All Men 2021 75% 25%
Gender All Women 2021 68% 33%
Gender Primary Reserve Men 2021 71% 29%
Gender Primary Reserve Women 2021 70% 31%
Gender Regular Force Men 2021 76% 24%
Gender Regular Force Women 2021 67% 33%
Component Primary Reserve 2021 71% 29%
Component Regular Force 2021 74% 26%
CAF Rank Overall Junior Non-Commissioned Member 2021 67% 33%
CAF Rank Overall Junior Officer 2021 78% 22%
CAF Rank Overall Senior Non-Commissioned Member 2021 82% 18%
CAF Rank Overall Senior Officer 2021 84% 16%
CAF Rank Primary Reserve Junior Non-Commissioned Member 2021 66% 34%
CAF Rank Primary Reserve Junior Officer 2021 74% 26%
CAF Rank Primary Reserve Senior Non-Commissioned Member 2021 82% 18%
CAF Rank Primary Reserve Senior Officer 2021 88% 13%
CAF Rank Regular Force Junior Non-Commissioned Member 2021 67% 33%
CAF Rank Regular Force Junior Officer 2021 80% 20%
CAF Rank Regular Force Senior Non-Commissioned Member 2021 82% 18%
CAF Rank Regular Force Senior Officer 2021 83% 17%

Data Source: Your Say Survey: Programs & Policies (2021)

More information: Restorative Engagement Program

Context

In 2016-2017, seven former military members filed class action lawsuits against the Canadian Armed Forces for sexual assault, sexual harassment, and discrimination based on gender or sexual orientation. In November 2019, the Federal Court approved the CAF-DND Sexual Misconduct Class Action Settlement.

As part of the settlement agreement, DND/CAF established a Restorative Engagement Program to enable members of the CAF-DND Sexual Misconduct Class Action Settlement to share their experiences, impacts and insights with Defence Representatives and to contribute to Defence Team efforts to build a more inclusive and respectful institutional culture. The program is run by the Sexual Misconduct Support and Resource Centre (SMSRC).

Recent actions

The SMSRC launched the Restorative Engagement program in November 2021. In January 2022, the first groups of Defence representatives began working in cohorts with restorative practitioners to develop the knowledge and skills needed to engage with class members and translate what they learned into meaningful action for culture change. The program has continued to bring together Defence representatives to meet the class members’ needs for engagements and to learn from them, and the activities are expected to continue into 2026.

The settlement mandated a restorative engagement program. This program launched in November 2021 and allows members of the CAF-DND Sexual Misconduct Class Action Settlement to share their experience(s) of sexual misconduct, the impact it has had on their life and career and/or provide their knowledge, ideas, and insights on how to improve and contribute to culture change in DND/CAF. This shared understanding between class members and DND/CAF representatives will help the Defence Team to build a more inclusive and respectful institutional culture.

In May 2022, the Minister of National Defence granted a regulatory amendment to create an exception to the Duty to Report, in the context of a restorative engagement program. This amendment allows the program to be delivered as per its intended design but does not limit a class member's ability to report. It helps to ensure others are not reporting on their behalf, and that CAF members who have volunteered to listen, acknowledge, and learn from class members' experiences are not put in a position where they are obligated to report incidents of wrongdoing, regardless of whether the affected person is ready or willing to report them.

Data sources

For details on the methodology of data analysis, including descriptions of each data source, please visit the List of data sources page.

Page details

Date modified: