Annual Report to Parliament 2024-2025 Administration of the Privacy Act
1. Introduction
The Department of National Defence (DND/CAF) and the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) are pleased to present to Parliament its annual report on the administration of the Privacy ActFootnote 1 (the Act). Section 72 of the Act requires the head of every federal government institution to submit an annual report to Parliament on the administration of the Act each fiscal year. This report describes National Defence activities that support compliance with the Privacy Act for the fiscal year (FY) commencing 1 April 2024 and ending 31 March 2025.
1.1 Purpose of the Privacy Act
The purpose of the Privacy Act is to extend the present laws of Canada that protect the privacy of individuals with respect to personal information about themselves held by a government institution and provide individuals with a right of access to that information.
These rights of protection and access are in accordance with the principles that individuals should have a right to know why their information is collected by the government, how it will be used, how long it will be kept and who will have access to it.
Service agreements
The Department of National Defence and the Canadian Armed Forces had no service agreements pursuant to section 73.1 of the Privacy Act during the fiscal year.
2. Access to Information and Privacy at National Defence
2.1 Mandate of National Defence and the Canadian Armed Forces
Who we are
The DND/CAF support a strategic vision for defence in which Canada is strong at home, secure in North America and engaged in the world. From regular forces to reserve forces and civilian employees, the Defence Team stretches from coast to coast to coast. Its membership represents the strength, skills and diversity of Canada, and brings the experience necessary to protect and support Canadians no matter what is asked of them.
What we do
DND and the CAF have complementary roles to play in:
- Providing advice and support to theMinister of National Defence
- Implementing Government decisions regarding the defence of Canadian interests at home and abroad.
The CAF serves on the sea, on land, in the air, and in space and cyberspace with the Royal Canadian Navy, the Canadian Army, the Royal Canadian Air Force and the Canadian Special Operations Forces Command. In 2024, Canada released its renewed defence policy,Our North, Strong and Free, which outlines Canada's plan to ensure the CAF remains ready, resilient and relevant in the context of increasing global uncertainty. This means doing more to keep us strong at home, secure in North America and engaged in the world, under six themes including:
- Supporting our people by placing focus on recruitment, retention and personal management, as well as investments into the quality of life for military members in form of support for health, housing and childcare. For all that CAF members give up for Canadians they all deserve to feel safe and valued in their workplace, it is our priority progress culture change.
- Strengthening the foundations of our military to ensure CAF members have the tools they need to do their job effectively and keep them safe. This will include modernizing existing capabilities and acquiring new ones; building civilian capacity; reviewing and reforming defence procurement; accelerating digital transformation.
- Building an innovative industrial base by leveraging innovation and fostering relationships with industry partners to sustain existing equipment and accelerate production capacity in Canada. This will allow the CAF to make reliable and valuable contributions to our allies and partners, particularly in the Euro-Atlantic and Indo-Pacific regions, in support of a more stable, peaceful world.
- Defending Canada in the Arctic and northern regions, where the changing physical and geopolitical landscapes have created new threats and vulnerabilities. By upgrading our continental defences to better detect incoming threats we can remain ready to assist when Canadians face natural disasters and other emergencies or are in need of search and rescue support.
- Defending North America as an active partner with the United States to restore continental defence and deterrence in all domains: sea, land, air, space and cyber, and through a modernized NORAD.
- Advancing Canada's global interests and values through continuing valuable Canadian Armed Forces contributions to global efforts to deter major power conflict, confront terrorism and insurgency, and address instability.
2.2 The Defence Team
The National DefenceAct (NDA) establishes DND and the CAF as separate entities, operating within an integrated National Defence Headquarters as they pursue their primary responsibility of providing defence for Canada and Canadians.
Senior leadership
The Governor General of Canada is the Commander-in-Chief of Canada. DND is headed by the Minister of National Defence. The Associate Minister of National Defence supports the Minister of National Defence. The Deputy Minister of National Defence is the Department's senior civil servant. The CAF are headed by the Chief of the Defence Staff, Canada's senior serving officer. These senior leaders each have different responsibilities:
- The Governor General is responsible for appointing the Chief of the Defence Staff on the recommendation of the Prime Minister, awarding military honours, presenting colours to CAF regiments, approving new military badges and insignia, and signing commission scrolls;
- The Minister of National Defence presides over the Department and over all matters relating to national defence;
- The Associate Minister is also responsible for defence files, as mandated by the Prime Minister, with the specific priority of ensuring that CAF members have the equipment they need to do their jobs;
- The Deputy Minister is responsible for policy, resources, interdepartmental coordination and international defence relations; and
- The Chief of the Defence Staff is responsible for command, control and administration of the CAF, as well as military strategy, plans and requirements.
Defence organization
The DND/CAF organizational structure is represented in the diagram below. Additional information about the DND/CAF organization is available online.Footnote 2 For a description of the groups and positions responsible for meeting each applicable proactive publication requirement under Part 2 of the Access to Information Act, see section 8.2 "Proactive Publication".
Figure 1: National Defence Organization Chart

Caption
Senior Leadership
The Governor General of Canada is the Commander-in-Chief of Canada. DND is headed by the Minister of National Defence, a federal Cabinet Minister. The Associate Minister of National Defence supports the Minister of National Defence and is also a federal Cabinet Minister. The Deputy Minister of National Defence is the Department's senior civil servant. The CAF are headed by the Chief of the Defence Staff, Canada's senior serving officer. Each has different responsibilities:
- The Governor General is responsible for appointing the Chief of the Defence Staff on the recommendation of the Prime Minister, awarding military honours, presenting colours to CAF regiments, approving new military badges and insignia and signing commission scrolls.
- The Minister of National Defence presides over the Department and over all matters relating to national defence.
- The Associate Minister is also responsible for defence files, as mandated by the Prime Minister, with the specific priority of ensuring that CAF members have the equipment they need to do their jobs.
- The Deputy Minister is responsible for policy, resources, interdepartmental coordination and international defence relations.
- The Chief of the Defence Staff is responsible for command, control and administration of the CAF and military strategy, plans and requirements.
Independent of the reporting structure, the Chief Military Judge, an arm's-length organization, is considered part of the Defence portfolio.
Reporting to the Minister of National Defence are:
- Associate Minister of National Defence
- Deputy Minister of National Defence
- Chief of the Defence Staff
- Judge Advocate General (provides legal services to the Deputy Minister and the Chief of the Defence Staff, but responsible to the Minister of National Defence for performance of duties)
- Ombudsman
- Military Grievances External Review Committee (considered part of the Defence portfolio)
- Military Police Complaints Commission (considered part of the Defence portfolio)
- Communications Security Establishment (considered part of the Defence portfolio)
Reporting to both the Deputy Minister of National Defence and the Chief of the Defence Staff are:
- Vice Chief of the Defence Staff
- Assistant Deputy Minister (Public Affairs)
- Assistant Deputy Minister (Defence Research and Development Canada)
- Assistant Deputy Minister (Information Management)
- Assistant Deputy Minister (Review Services)
- Assistant Deputy Minister (Data, Innovation and Analytics)
- Chief of Defence Intelligence
- National Security and Intelligence Review and Oversight Coordination Secretariat
- DND/CF Legal Advisor (provides legal services on civilian issues; responsible to the Department of Justice but responsive to the Deputy Minister and the Chief of the Defence Staff)
Reporting to the Deputy Minister of National Defence are:
- Associate Deputy Minister
- Assistant Deputy Minister (Policy)
- Assistant Deputy Minister (Finance)
- Assistant Deputy Minister (Materiel)
- Assistant Deputy Minister (Infrastructure & Environment)
- Assistant Deputy Minister (Human Resources – Civilian)
- Corporate Secretary
- Chief, Professional Conduct and Culture
- Executive Director Departmental Litigation Oversight
- Sexual Misconduct Support and Resource Centre
Reporting to the Chief of the Defence Staff are:
2.3 The Directorate of Access to Information and Privacy
Delegation of authority
In accordance with section 73(1) of the Privacy Act, a delegation of authority, signed by the Minister, designates the Deputy Minister, Corporate Secretary, Executive Director of Access to Information and Privacy, and Access to Information and Privacy (ATIP) Deputy Directors to exercise all powers and functions of the Minister, as the head of institution under the Act. It also designates other specific powers and functions to employees within the Directorate Access to Information and Privacy.
Under the authority of the Corporate Secretary, the ATIP Executive Director administers and coordinates the Access to Information Act and the Privacy Act, and acts as the departmental ATIP Coordinator. In the administration of the Act, the ATIP Directorate seeks advice on legal, public affairs, policy, and operational security matters from other organizations and specialists as required.
A copy of the Access to Information Act and Privacy Act Designation Order is provided at Annex A.
The ATIP Directorate
The ATIP Directorate is responsible for matters regarding access to information and privacy protection within the National Defence portfolio, except for the following organizations: the Military Police Complaints Commission, the Military Grievances External Review Committee, the Communications Security Establishment, the Office of the National Defence and Canadian Forces Ombudsman, the Director of Defence Counsel Services, and the Canadian Forces Morale and Welfare Services.
The ATIP Directorate is managed by an Executive Director and supported by a corporate services team that is responsible for the administrative and management functions of the directorate, including business planning, financial management, human resources, physical security, and information and records management (IM/RM). The workforce is divided functionally into three main areas, further supported by Defence Team organization liaison officers, as illustrated in the diagram at FIGURE 2.
The ATIP Operations Division oversees all activities related to access to information and privacy requests, including ATIP Intake. This ensures consistency in the execution of departmental processes and application of the Acts and allows for quality assurance activities, tracking, reporting, and monitoring of trends and rising issues.
The Defence Privacy Management (DPM) Division's primary mandate is to oversee departmental compliance with the Privacy Act; the division manages privacy impact assessments; resolution of privacy breaches and systemic issues; and provides guidance on privacy policy obligations as well as expertise and advice to senior management on contentious and sensitive issues while ensuring continuous improvements of privacy policy and service delivery for the department.
The ATIP-Program Support Division delivers training and promotes ATIP awareness, performs data analytics and reports on program performance, and provides ATIP related advice and guidance to the ATIP Directorate and the wider DND/CAF community.
During the reporting period the ATIP Directorate had the full-time equivalent of 70.29 employees and 4.5 consultants dedicated to Privacy Act activities.
Figure 2: National Defence ATIP Operational Workforce

Caption
National Defence ATIP operational workforce
ATI Operations
Receive and process requests for records in accordance with the "rights of access" provided by the Access to Information Act and the Privacy Act. Seek and receive relevant records from Defence Team organizations. Conduct line-by-line review of records. Consult other parties for disclosure recommendations. Apply ATI Act and Privacy Act provisions. Respond to formal complaints from the Office of the Information Commissioner and the Office of the Privacy Commissioner.
Defence Privacy Management Oversee organizational compliance with the Privacy Act and policy obligations. Provide expertise and strategic advice to senior management. Conduct privacy risk assessments. Provide privacy advisory services and processes requests related to public interest disclosures and legal instruments for the disclosure of personal information. Support the review of allegations of mismanagement of personal information; including formal complaints received from the Office of the Privacy Commissioner.
ATIP Program Support Provide strategic advice and issues management support. Develop ATIP related internal policy instruments. Perform data analytics and report on program performance. Maintain internal applications and provide technical support. Deliver ATIP training and awareness program. Develop and implement the ATIP Recruitment and Development Program.
ATI & Privacy Liaison Officers Support the ATIP program by coordinating ATI and Privacy activities across offices of primary interest within their respective groups.
3. Highlights of the Statistical Report
The statistical report at Annex B consists of data submitted by DND/CAF as part of Treasury Board Secretariat (TBS) annual collection of ATIP-related statistics. The following sections contain highlights, trends and an analysis of notable statistical data from a departmental perspective.
3.1 Requests received
During the reporting period, DND/CAF received 6,891 requests for personal information under the Privacy Act, representing a 0.5% increase from the previous reporting period. Combined with a carry-over of 1,495 files from FY 2023-24, this represents a total workload of 8,386 requests during the reporting period. At the end of FY 2024-25, the number of requests carried over to FY 2025-26 decreased 29% to 1,066.
Figure 3: Privacy Request Workload (Last Five Years)

Caption
Privacy Request workload
In 2020-2021, 5275 requests were received, 853 requests were carried over from the previous reporting period. A combined workload of 6128 requests.
In 2021-2022, 6158 requests were received, 1224 requests were carried over from the previous reporting period. A combined workload of 7382 requests.
In 2022-2023, 6393 requests were received, 815 requests were carried over from the previous reporting period. A combined workload of 7208 requests.
In 2023-2024, 6857 requests were received, 1156 requests were carried over from the previous reporting period. A combined workload of 8013 requests.
In 2024-2025, 6891 requests were received, 1495 requests were carried over from the previous reporting period. A combined workload of 8386 requests.
3.2 Requests completed
DND/CAF closed a total of 7,320 privacy requests during the reporting period. This represents an 11.5% increase over the previous FY. The total ATIP workload over the past five years is represented in FIGURE 4 below.
Figure 4: Disposition of Requests Completed and Total Requests Closed (Last Five Years)

Caption
Disposition of Request Completed and Total Requests Closed
In 2020-2021, 982 requests were all disclosed, 2269 were disclosed in part, and 35 requests where nothing was disclosed, 1211 requests where no records exist, 407 were abandoned. A total of 4904 were closed.
In 2021-2022, 1270 requests were all disclosed, 3430 were disclosed in part, and 53 requests where nothing was disclosed, 1311 requests where no records exist, 503 were abandoned. A total of 6567 were closed.
In 2022-2023, 1220 requests were all disclosed, 3015 were disclosed in part, and 43 requests where nothing was disclosed, 1312 requests where no records exist, 462 were abandoned. A total of 6052 were closed.
In 2023-2024, 1285 requests were all disclosed, 2713 were disclosed in part, and 37 requests where nothing was disclosed, 1666 requests where no records exist, 865 were abandoned. A total of 6568 were closed.
In 2024-2025, 1676 requests were all disclosed, 3058 were disclosed in part, and 27 requests where nothing was disclosed, 1709 requests where no records exist, 847 were abandoned. A total of 7320 were closed.
Pages reviewed
This year, a total of 1,539,185 pages were processed this FY. This represents an increase of 20% over FY 2023-24 where 1,282,442 pages were processed (FIGURE 5).
This number does not include the number of pages processed for requests reviewed in the current FY that were carried over into the next reporting period.
Figure 5: Number of Pages Reviewed for Requests Closed, Where Records Existed (Last Three Years)

Caption
Number of Pages Reviewed for Requests Closed, where Records Existed
In 2022-2023, 1 282 023 pages reviewed for 4740 requests closed
In 2023-2024, 1 282 442 pages reviewed for 4902 requests closed
In 2024-2025, 1 539 185 pages reviewed for 5608 requests closed
Exemptions and exclusions
Consistent with previous reporting periods, section 26 of the Privacy Act was the most frequently invoked exemption and was applied in 3,054 requests. This section of the Act protects the releasing of personal information of individuals other than to the requester.
Completion time
DND/CAF closed 5,209 requests within the legislated timeline of 30 days; this represents 71.2% of the total volume of requests closed. This equates to an increase of 25% compared to the last reporting period with 46.2% of requests closed within 30 days.
Figure 6: Time to Complete Requests (Last Five Years)

Caption
Time to Complete Requests
In 2020-2021, 2925 requests were closed in 30 days or less, 539 requests were closed between 31-60 days, 452 requests were closed between 61-120 days, and 988 requests were closed in 121 days or more.
In 2021-2022, 4482 requests were closed in 30 days or less, 938 requests were closed between 31-60 days, 442 requests were closed between 61-120 days and, 705 requests were closed in 121 days or more
In 2022-2023, 3181 requests were closed in 30 days or less, 1720 requests were closed between 31-60 days, 628 requests were closed between 61-120 days and, 523 requests were closed in 121 days or more
In 2023-2024, 3034 requests were closed in 30 days or less, 1793 requests were closed between 31-60 days, 799 requests were closed between 61-120 days and, 942 requests were closed in 121 days or more
In 2024-2025, 5209 requests were closed in 30 days or less, 582 requests were closed between 31-60 days, 459 requests were closed between 61-120 days and, 1070 requests were closed in 121 days or more
Files closed beyond 30 days were not necessarily late as legal extensions under the legislation may have been applied.
Extensions
Section 15 of thePrivacy Actpermits the statutory time limits to be extended if consultations are necessary, if translation is required or if the request is for a large volume of records and processing it within the original time limit would unreasonably interfere with the operations of the Department.
In total, 188 extensions were applied during the FY 2024-25 reporting period. Each of the extensions were deemed necessary, as meeting the original time limit would unreasonably interfere with the operations of the institution.
Number of active requests - outstanding from previous reporting periods
At the end of the FY 2024-25 reporting period, DND/CAF had 1,066 active requests. A breakdown of outstanding requests by the reporting period in which the request was received, and whether the request is still within the legislated timelines (including extensions) is provided below in FIGURE 7.
Figure 7: Number of Active requests (as of 31 March 2025)

Caption
Number of Active Requests- Outstanding from Previous Reporting Periods
Of the requests received in 2024-25 (and active on March 31, 2025), 467 were within legislated timelines; 599 were beyond legislated timelines
Of the requests received in 2023-24 (and active on March 31, 2025), 523 were within legislated timelines; 872 were beyond legislated timelines
FIGURE 8: Number of ACTIVE COMPLAINTS (as of 31 March 2025)

Caption
Number of Active Complaints – Outstanding from Previous Reporting Periods
Of the complaints active on March 31, 2025:
25 complaints were received in 2024-25
9 complaints were received in 2023-24
7 complaints were received in 2022-23
4 complaints were received in 2021-22 or earlier
Number of active complaints - outstanding from previous reporting periods
At the end of the reporting period, National Defence had 45 active complaints with the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC). A breakdown of active complaints by reporting period is provided at FIGURE 8.
On-time compliance
A total of 5,449 requests (74.4%) were closed within statutory deadlines in FY 2024-25. This represents a 4.7% increase in on-time compliance over the previous reporting period.
The most common reason for deemed refusal was "Interference with Operations/Workload," cited for over 60% of requests closed late during the reporting period.As defined by TBS, this reason relates to requests where there is"interwoven information and review is required to determine exemptions, there were a large number of requests to be processed at the time, the request consisted of a high volume of records, there were difficulties in obtaining relevant information, or there were other ATIP-related tasks."
Figure 9: All Disclosed vs. Disclosed in Part (FY 2024–25)

Caption
Requests All Disclosed and Disclosed in Part
3058 requests were disclosed in part
1676 requests were all Disclosed
2586 requests were other
Disposition: percentage of requests all disclosed vs. disclosed in part
During the reporting period, Defence responded to a total of 7,320 requests; of which 22.9% were "all disclosed" (1,676) and 41.8% (3,058) were "disclosed in part." The remaining requests were completed as all exempted, no records exist or abandoned.
3.3 Consultations received and completed
Historically, DND/CAF does not receive many consultation requests relating to requests made under the Privacy Act. During the reporting period, DND/CAF received eight requests for consultation; all eight requests for consultation were received from other Government of Canada institutions. A total of six consultations were closed during the reporting period; three requests for consultation were completed within 15 days, one was completed between 16 to 30 days and one was completed between 31 to 60 days.
4. Privacy Protection and Personal Information Management
4.1 Public interest disclosures
Paragraph 8(2)(m) of the Privacy Act permits the disclosure of personal information, without the consent of the individual to whom it relates, where the public interest in disclosure clearly outweighs any invasion of privacy that could result, or where the disclosure would clearly benefit the individual to whom the information relates.
During the reporting period, 67 disclosures of personal information were made in accordance with paragraph 8(2)(m). Disclosures made in the public interest included but were not limited to, disclosures to the media relating to departmental actions in response to allegations of misconduct, and disclosures to CAF member's family or representative relating to Boards of Inquiry or Summary Investigations into the death of a CAF member.
For each of the 67 disclosures made in the public interest during FY 2024-25, the OPC was notified; wherever possible, notification occurred in advance of the disclosure.
4.2 Privacy breaches
Personal information under the control of DND/CAF is subject to the Privacy Act, which governs the safeguarding, collection, retention, use and disclosure of personal information. The DPM Division receives reports of privacy breaches from the DND and the CAF and supports the department during the assessment, containment and notification stages. During this reporting period, 275 complaints were received regarding a contravention of one or more provisions of the Act. The DPM Division reviewed, resolved and issued a final determination relating to 309 complaints; of these, 238 were deemed to be well-founded.
Material privacy breaches
The TBS Policy on Privacy Protection defines a privacy breach as the improper or unauthorized access to, creation, collection, use, disclosure, retention, or disposal of personal information. A material breach is defined as a privacy breach that could reasonably be expected to create a real risk of significant harm to an individual. Two privacy breaches that met the threshold of a material breach were reported by DND/CAF to the OPC and the TBS.
One material privacy breach related to large amounts of personal information that was inadvertently stored on a common shared drive, and the second related to unauthorized access to the Canadian Forces Health Information System (CFHIS). In both cases, the personal information was promptly secured, access to records was removed, and a notification was issued to all affected personnel.
DND/CAF continues to refine our privacy breach management processes, to align with the updated definition for material privacy breaches, and to incorporate the updated tools to assess the real risk of significant harm to an individual and the institution.
4.3 Privacy impact assessments
DND/CAF collects, uses and discloses personal information in the delivery of mandated programs and services. In accordance with TBS policy, the DND and the CAF undertake privacy impact assessments (PIA) to evaluate impacts to personal information in the administration of these activities. A PIA provides a framework to identify the extent to which proposals comply with the Privacy Act and applicable privacy policies, assist program officials in avoiding or mitigating privacy risks, and promote informed program and system design choices.
DND/CAF completedFootnote 3 two PIAs during FY 2024-25. The descriptions of PIAs are found below.
Evidence-Based Character Assessments for Leadership Selections and Promotions
DND/CAF recognizes that leaders of good character are critical in protecting the health and welfare of Canadian ArmedForces (CAF)members, and in instilling confidence in the credibility and operational effectiveness of Canada's military. Accordingly, it important for senior military leaders to embody the values the CAF seeks to impart and those of contemporary Canadians. In 2020-2021, recognizing the above, DND/CAF began developing processes and procedures to improve the evaluation of its senior-most leadership candidates. Its goal was to develop more evidence-based assessments of those seeking promotions or appointments to senior military positions, and to more objectively assess the character of leadership hopefuls.
Facilitating the Recruitment of Permanent Residents in the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF)
Beginning in January 2025, DND/CAF and Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) began sharing personal information about Permanent Residents (PR) who have expressed an interest in joining the CAF. The information exchanged will be used for the sole purpose of facilitating the enrollment and security screening of PRs and to expedite their onboarding to the CAF. The Project is part of a broader initiative at DND/CAF to replenish and enhance the CAFs ranks through the recruitment of trained military personnel from foreign countries, and to improve the appeal of military service through the use of citizenship and employment incentives.
In addition, the ATIP Directorate continues to provide ongoing privacy advisory services to DND/CAF organizations assessing risks to personal information used in the administration of Defence programs.
4.4 Departmental personal information
Complex & sensitive personal information
To ensure the appropriate protection of sensitive personal information within the Department, the ATIP Directorate provides review and redaction services to support a number of departmental administrative processes including Boards of Inquiry, Summary Investigations, reports involving allegations of Workplace violence, harassment and grievances. Although these are not formal requests made under the Privacy Act, the information is being released by the Department and privacy protection is a priority. The DPM Division reviewed 67 files containing complex and sensitive personal information in FY 2024-25. This represents a total of 889 pages reviewed to ensure personal information is protected and not inappropriately disclosed.
5. Complaints, Audits and Reviews
5.1 Complaints from the Office of the Privacy Commissioner
In FY 2024-25, DND/CAF received a total of 82 formal complaints from the Office of the Privacy Commissioner (OPC).
Statistical reporting requirements for complaints and investigations with the OPC are noted below:
- Section 31: When the OPC gives formal notice of their intention to investigate a complaint regarding the processing of a request under the Act.
- Defence received 82 such notices during FY 2024-25; 82 such notices were also reported in the previous reporting period.
- Section 33:When the OPC requests further representations from institutions pursuant to an ongoing complaint investigation.
- Defence received 92 such notices during FY 2024-25 in comparison to 83 such notices in the previous reporting period.
- Section 35: When the OPC issues a findings report for a well-founded complaint upon conclusion of an investigation.
- During the reporting period, 42 complaints were found to have merit. Note that these complaints are not necessarily from the 82 complaints received during the reporting period.
Figure 10: Complaints Resolved (FY 2024–25)

Caption
Complaints Resolves (FY 2024-25)
5 Not Well Founded
42 Well Founded
46 Resolved
The 42 well-founded determinations represent 45.2% of all findings issued by the OPC to DND/CAF in FY 2024-25. Of the well-founded determinations, 39 were administrative in nature (relating to delays and time extensions), one related to right of access and two related to an unauthorized disclosure. Figure 10.
Efforts continued to be placed on resolving outstanding complaints with the OPC received in previous reporting periods. The ATIP Directorate collaborated with the OPC to manage complaints effectively and consistently strives to maintain transparent communications to foster a positive working relationship with the OPC.
5.2 Court decisions
In FY 2024-25, two court proceedings were actioned as a result of requests processed by DND/CAF. Both were discontinued after responses were sent to the requesters.
5.3 Key actions taken on complaints
DND/CAF took actions during the reporting period to address the issues raised by the Office of the Privacy Commissioner and the Standing Committee on National Defence.
A multi-disciplinary ATIP working group consisting of representatives from the ATIP Directorate, the Directorate of Enterprise Architecture, and Review Services evaluated the ATIP process to identify areas for improvement. Subsequently an agile project management approach was implemented to develop initiatives aimed at improving the ATIP process across DND/CAF.
DND/CAF is committed to addressing process challenges through this ongoing effort and continues to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of the initiatives undertaken.
6. Policies and Procedures
In response to the TBS updates to the privacy policy suite issued in November 2024, the DPM Division reviewed and updated the Defence Administration Orders and Directives (DAOD) that pertain to the Department's administration of the Privacy Act. A DAOD is corporate administrative direction set out by the DND/CAF to supplement higher-level legal authorities and/or directives from the TBS and other central agencies. Internal consultations are scheduled for FY 2025-26, after which the updated direction relating to personal information management, privacy breach management, privacy impact assessments, and responsible disclosures of personal information will be provided to the department.
6.1 Social insurance numbers
As defined by the terms of the court ordered Final Settlement Agreement for the CAF-DND Sexual Misconduct Class Action lawsuit, Social Insurance Numbers (SIN) are incidentally collected to uphold the departments obligations as part of the Restorative Engagement (RE) Program, for survivors to share their experiences of sexual misconduct with senior CAF and/or DND representatives. A Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) on the Sexual Misconduct Support and Resource Centre (SMSRC) RE program was completed in FY 2023-24. The SIN is used for historical file retrieval when it is the only identifier available for former government employees or military members. The collection and use of the SIN for the RE program is consistent with Appendix A of the TBS Directive on the SIN.
7. Training and Awareness
7.1 ATIP training program
Departmental ATIP training was provided on a virtual platform. Directorate training staff delivered the following training sessions to the Defence Team with specific emphasis on those staff with ATIP responsibilities:
- Access to Information and Privacy Fundamentals (COR502 – Offered online by the Canada School of the Public Service, this course is a prerequisite for all departmental ATIP training);
- Introductory DND/CAF ATIP courses [ATIP at DND (formally ATIP 101 - General ATIP), or Privacy Fundamentals];
- Orientation session for new employees of the ATIP Directorate;
- Advanced DND/CAF ATIP courses (ATIP 201 - Advanced ATIP or organization-specific content); and,
- ATIP awareness and engagement activities with the various branches and divisions.
7.2 Training and awareness activities
In the past year, DND/CAF launched a new online, self-directed training program—ATIP at DND—which replaced the previous ATIP 101 course. This modernized approach played a key role in achieving a 23.6% increase in training participationcompared to the previous year.
In addition, Advanced ATIP training sessionswere delivered virtually on a bi-weekly basis, reaching approximately 250 participants per session. These sessions provided Defence Team personnel and CAF members with comprehensive instruction on the administration of theAccess to Information Actand the Privacy Act, as well as guidance on the appropriate management of personal information under institutional control.
Furthermore, 4,174 DND/CAF personnel completed the Canada School of Public Service (CSPS) ATIP Fundamentals course during the reporting period. This course served as a mandatory prerequisite for all DND-specific ATIP training, reinforcing foundational knowledge across the organization
Canadian Forces Health Services training
The Canadian Forces Health Services (CFHS) operates a privacy office that is responsible for providing advice and support to the CFHS Group on policies and activities that involve personal health information. In accordance with their mandate, the CHFS privacy office maintains training modules to educate staff on the principles of "Privacy, Confidentiality and Security" to support appropriate use of the Canadian Forces Health Information System.
During this reporting period, 3,076 Canadian Forces Health Services staff attended training or completed mandatory modules offered specifically to the CFHS organization.
8. Initiatives and Projects
An initiative has been started to provide serving and released CAF members more direct access to their own commonly requested personal information. This approach is expected to streamline processing of these records, resulting in timely production of records and increased capacity within the ATIP Directorate.
During the reporting period, the DPM Division continued efforts to strengthen the Defence Privacy Management Program. Initiatives include:
A Privacy Risk Assessment Benchmark Questionnaire was completed in December 2023 to assess the sensitivity and complexity of programs involving personal information across the DND and the CAF. Efforts continued throughout this reporting period to compile the results of the questionnaire and validate the scores. The results were used to prioritize PIA work across the department in 2024-25 to ensure privacy services and support was aligned to support Defence priorities where personal information is involved.
The pilot project to reduce the administration for low-risk privacy breaches that was undertaken in FY 2023-24 was fully adopted during the current reporting period. All low-risk privacy breaches are reported, assessed and closed using a digital report of findings. This has increased the efficiency of case file administration for analysts allowing them to focus on detailed administration medium and high-risk privacy breaches. This reduced administration allowed DND/CAF to close 260 low-risk privacy breaches this reporting period; this represents an 89.78% increase in low-risk files closed over the previous year.
9. Monitoring Compliance
To provide effective oversight and reporting of ATIP performance within DND/CAF, the ATIP Directorate produces a monthly dashboard that measures the timeliness of OPI record retrieval, overall ATIP compliance, and critical indicators such as privacy breach complaints. Using Microsoft Power BI to publish the ATIP dashboard has enhanced its usability and visibility to senior leadership on key metrics and ATIP performance. The monthly dashboard serves to track ATIP performance across the Department and identify organizations who may require assistance or training, and to identify areas for process improvements.
Additionally, the ATIP Directorate responds to on-demand requests for statistics and performance reports to support program-specific requirements and departmental ATIP obligations.
Currently, the time to process requests for correction of personal information is not formally monitored as this number is regularly very low. In FY 2024-25, the ATIP Directorate did not receive any requests for correction.
The DPM Division offers Advisory Services to senior officials and executives of the DND/CAF when developing a contract or an Information Sharing Agreement to ensure that the appropriate privacy protections are included. Efforts to formalize a process with the contracting authority began this fiscal year. Efforts will continue into next reporting period, as DND/CAF works towards overhauling the department's InfoSource chapter.
Annex A: Delegation Order

Caption
DEPARTMENT OF NATIONAL DEFENCE AND THE CANADIAN ARMED FORCES
MINISTÈRE DE LA DÉFENSE NATIONALE ET LES FORCES ARMÉES CANADIENNES
DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY
ACCESS TO INFORMATION ACT AND PRIVACY ACT
I, Minister of National Defence, pursuant to section 95 of the Access to Information Act and section 73 of the Privacy Act, hereby delegate the persons holding the positions set out in the Delegation of Authority Schedules attached hereto, or the persons occupying on an acting basis those positions, to exercise the powers, duties and function of the Minister as head of National Defence, under the provisions of the Acts and related regulations set out in the schedule opposite each position.
This delegation supersedes all previous delegation orders.
DÉLÉGATION DE POUVOIRS
LOI SUR L'ACCÈS À L'INFORMATION ET LOI SUR LA PROTECTION DES RENSEIGNEMENTS PERSONNELS
En ma qualité de ministre de la Défense Nationale et conformément à l'article 95 de la Loi sur l'accès à l'information et l'article 73 de la Loi sur la protection des renseignements personnels, je délègue par la présente aux titulaires des postes énoncés aux l'annexes de délégation de pouvoirs ci-après, ou aux personnes occupant les dits postes à titre intérimaire, les attributions dont je suis investie, à titre de ministre de la Défense Nationale, aux termes des dispositions des lois et des règlements connexes mentionnés en regard de chaque poste.
Le présent arrêté remplace toute ordonnance de délégations de pouvoirs antérieure.
Original signed by
The Honourable William Sterling Blair, P.C., C.O.M., M.P.
Minister of National Defence
Date: 2024-02-23
Delegation of Authority Schedule - Access to Information Act
Delegation of the powers, duties and functions of the Minister of National Defence as the head of the institution for the Department of National Defence and the Canadian Armed Forces under theAccess to Information Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. A-1 (prior to and following June 21, 2019) and regulations.
To note: the Department of National Defence and the Canadian Armed Forces includes a number of organizations with varying degrees of independent authority. The powers, duties and functions in the present order shall not apply to the activities of the following organizations:
- The Military Police Complaints Commission;
- The National Defence and Canadian Forces Ombudsman;
- The Military Grievances External Review Committee;
- The Canadian Forces Morale and Welfare Services;
- The Director of Defence Counsel Services; and,
- Any other organization of the Department of National Defence and the Canadian Armed Forces to whom the Minister of National Defence may delegate such powers.
| Position | Delegation |
|---|---|
| Deputy Minister | Full Authority |
| Corporate Secretary | Full Authority |
| Executive Director, Access to Information and Privacy | Full Authority |
| Chief of Operations | Full Authority |
| Provisions | Description | Deputy Director(s), Access to Information | Team Leader(s), Access to Information |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4(2.1) | Responsibility of government institutions | Applicable | N/A |
| 6.1(1) | Reasons for declining to act on request | N/A | N/A |
| 6.1 (1.3), (1.4), (2) | Notice– suspension, end of suspension | N/A | N/A |
| 7 | Notice when access requested | Applicable | Applicable |
| 8(1) | Transfer of request to another government institution | Applicable | N/A |
| 9(1) | Extension of time limits | Applicable | Applicable |
| 9(2) | Notice of extension to Information Commissioner | Applicable | Applicable |
| 10 | Where access is refused | Applicable | Applicable |
| 10 (2) | Existence of a record not required to be disclosed | N/A | N/A |
| 11(2) | Application fee waiver | Applicable | Applicable |
| 12(2)(b) | Language of access | Applicable | N/A |
| 12(3)(b) | Access in an alternative format | Applicable | N/A |
| Exemption provisions of the Access to Information Act | |||
| 13 | Information obtained in confidence | Applicable | Applicable |
| 14 | Federal-provincial affairs | Applicable | N/A |
| 15 | International affairs and defence | Applicable | N/A |
| 16 | Law enforcement and investigations | Applicable | N/A |
| 16 (3) | Policing services for provinces or municipalities | Applicable | Applicable |
| 16.5 | Public Servants Disclosure Protection Act | Applicable | Applicable |
| 17 | Safety of individuals | Applicable | N/A |
| 18 | Economic interests of Canada | Applicable | N/A |
| 18.1 | Economic interest of certain government institutions | Applicable | N/A |
| 19 | Personal information | Applicable | Applicable |
| 20 | Third-party information | Applicable | Applicable |
| 21 | Operations of Government | Applicable | N/A |
| 22 | Testing procedures, tests and audits | Applicable | N/A |
| 22.1 | Internal audits | Applicable | N/A |
| 23 | Protected information –solicitors, advocates and notaries | Applicable | Applicable |
| 23.1 | Protected information – patents and trademarks | Applicable | N/A |
| 24 | Statutory prohibitions against disclosure | Applicable | Applicable |
| Other provisions of the Access to Information Act | |||
| 25 | Severability | Applicable | Applicable |
| 26 | Refusal of access if information to be published | Applicable | N/A |
| 27(1), (4) | Notice to third-party | Applicable | Applicable |
| 28(1)(b), (2), (4) | Representations of third-party and decision | Applicable | Applicable |
| 33 | Notice to Information Commissioner of notices to third parties | Applicable | Applicable |
| 35(2)(b) | Right to make representations | Applicable | N/A |
| 37(1)(c) | Notice of actions to implement recommendations of the Commissioner | N/A | N/A |
| 37(4) | Access to be given to complainant | N/A | N/A |
| 41(2) | Review by Federal Court – government institution | N/A | N/A |
| 43(2) | Service or notice of application to Federal Court for review | N/A | N/A |
| 44(2) | Notice to person who requested record | N/A | N/A |
| 52(2)(b), 52(3) | Special rules for hearings | N/A | N/A |
| 94 | Annual report – government institutions | N/A | N/A |
| Access to Information Act Regulations | |||
| 6(1) | Transfer of request | Applicable | N/A |
| 7(2) | Search and preparation fees | Applicable | N/A |
| 7(3) | Production and programming fees | Applicable | N/A |
| 8 | Providing access to record(s) | Applicable | N/A |
| 8.1 | Limitations in respect of format | Applicable | N/A |
Delegation of Authority Schedule - Privacy Act
Delegation of the powers, duties and function of the Minister of National Defence as the head of the institution for the Department of National Defence and the Canadian Armed Forces under the Privacy Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. P-21 and regulation.
To note: the Department of National Defence and the Canadian Armed Forces includes a number of organizations with varying degrees of independent authority. The powers, duties and functions in the present order shall not apply to the activities of the following organizations:
- The Military Police Complaints Commission;
- The National Defence and Canadian Forces Ombudsman;
- The Military Grievances External Review Committee;
- The Canadian Forces Morale and Welfare Services;
- The Director of Defence Counsel Services; and,
- Any other organization of the Department of National Defence and the Canadian Armed Forces to whom the Minister of National Defence may delegate such powers.
| Position | Delegation |
|---|---|
| Deputy Minister | Full Authority |
| Corporate Secretary | Full Authority |
| Executive Director Access to Information and Privacy | Full Authority |
| Chief of Operations | Full Authority |
| Provisions | Description | Deputy Director (s), Policy and Governance | Deputy Director (s), Privacy | Team Leader (s), Privacy | Senior Analyst (s), Privacy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8(2)(j) | Disclosure for research or statistical purposes | Applicable | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 8(2)(m) | Disclosure in the public interest or in the interest of the individual | Applicable | Applicable | N/A | N/A |
| 8(4) | Copies of requests under 8(2)(e) to be retained | Applicable | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 8(5) | Notice of disclosure under 8(2)(m) | Applicable | Applicable | N/A | N/A |
| 9(1) | Record of disclosures to be retained | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 9(4) | Consistent uses | Applicable | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 10 | Personal information to be included in personal information banks | Applicable | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 14(a) | Notice where access requested | N/A | Applicable | Applicable | N/A |
| 14(b) | Giving access to the record | N/A | Applicable | Applicable | N/A |
| 15 | Extension of time limits | N/A | Applicable | Applicable | Applicable |
| 16 (1) | Where access is refused | N/A | Applicable | Applicable | N/A |
| 16 (2) | Existence not required to be disclosed | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 17(2)(b) | Language of access | N/A | Applicable | N/A | N/A |
| 17(3)(b) | Access in an alternative format | N/A | Applicable | N/A | N/A |
| Exemption Provisions of the Privacy Act | |||||
| 18(2) | Exempt bank - Disclosure may be refused | N/A | Applicable | N/A | N/A |
| 19 | Information obtained in confidence | N/A | Applicable | Applicable | N/A |
| 20 | Federal-provincial affairs | N/A | Applicable | Applicable | N/A |
| 21 | International affairs and defence | N/A | Applicable | Applicable | N/A |
| 22 | Law enforcement and investigation | N/A | Applicable | Applicable | N/A |
| 22.3 | Public Servants Disclosure Protection Act | N/A | Applicable | Applicable | N/A |
| 23 | Security clearances | N/A | Applicable | Applicable | N/A |
| 24 | Individuals sentenced for an offence | N/A | Applicable | Applicable | N/A |
| 25 | Safety of individuals | N/A | Applicable | Applicable | N/A |
| 26 | Information about another individual | N/A | Applicable | Applicable | Applicable |
| 27 | Protected information – solicitors, advocates and notaries | N/A | Applicable | Applicable | N/A |
| 27.1 | Protected information –patents and trademarks | N/A | Applicable | Applicable | N/A |
| 28 | Medical record | N/A | Applicable | Applicable | N/A |
| Other Provisions of the Privacy Act | |||||
| 33(2) | Right to make representation | Applicable | Applicable | N/A | N/A |
| 35(1)(b) | Notice of actions to implement recommendations of Commissioner | Applicable | Applicable | N/A | N/A |
| 35(4) | Access to be given to complainant | Applicable | Applicable | N/A | N/A |
| 36(3)(b) | Notice of actions to implement recommendations of Commissioner concerning exempt banks | Applicable | Applicable | N/A | N/A |
| 51(2)(b) | Actions relating to international affairs and defence - special rules for hearings | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 51(3) | Actions relating to international affairs and defence - Ex parte representations | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 72 | Annual report to Parliament | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Privacy Act Regulations | |||||
| 7(a) | Retention of request for personal information received under paragraph 8(2)(e) | Applicable | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 9 | Reasonable facilities and time provided to examine personal information | N/A | Applicable | N/A | N/A |
| 11(2) | Notification concerning correction to personal information has been made | Applicable | Applicable | N/A | N/A |
| 11(4) | Notification that correction to personal information has been refused | Applicable | Applicable | N/A | N/A |
| 13(1) | Disclosure of personal information relating to physical or mental health | N/A | Applicable | N/A | N/A |
| 14 | Examination in presence of medical practitioner or psychologist | N/A | Applicable | N/A | N/A |
Annex B: Statistical Report on the Privacy Act for 2024-2025
Statistical Report on the Privacy Act
Name of institution: Department of National Defence
Reporting period: 2024-04-01 to 2025-03-31
Section 1: Requests Under the Privacy Act
| - | Number of Requests |
|---|---|
| Received during reporting period | 6891 |
| Outstanding from previous reporting periods | 1495 |
|
531 |
|
964 |
| Total | 8386 |
| Closed during reporting period | 7320 |
| Carried over to next reporting period | 1066 |
|
467 |
|
599 |
| Source | Number of Requests |
|---|---|
| Online | 4231 |
| 967 | |
| 1693 | |
| In person | 0 |
| Phone | 0 |
| Fax | 0 |
| Total | 6891 |
Section 2: Informal requests
| - | Number of Requests |
|---|---|
| Received during reporting period | 0 |
| Outstanding from previous reporting periods | 0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
| Total | 0 |
| Closed during reporting period | 0 |
| Carried over to next reporting period | 0 |
| Source | Number of Requests |
|---|---|
| Online | 0 |
| 0 | |
| 0 | |
| In person | 0 |
| Phone | 0 |
| Fax | 0 |
| Total | 0 |
| Completion Time | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 to 15 Days | 16 to 30 Days | 31 to 60 Days | 61 to 120 Days | 121 to 180 Days | 181 to 365 Days | More Than 365 Days | Total |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Less Than 100 Pages Released | 100-500 Pages Released | 501-1000 Pages Released | 1001-5000 Pages Released | More Than 5000 Pages Released | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Requests | Pages Released | Number of Requests | Pages Released | Number of Requests | Pages Released | Number of Requests | Pages Released | Number of Requests | Pages Released |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Section 3: Requests Closed During the Reporting Period
| Disposition of Requests | Completion Time | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 to 15 Days | 16 to 30 Days | 31 to 60 Days | 61 to 120 Days | 121 to 180 Days | 181 to 365 Days | More Than 365 Days | Total | |
| All disclosed | 330 | 948 | 150 | 110 | 56 | 62 | 20 | 1676 |
| Disclosed in part | 163 | 1488 | 303 | 280 | 183 | 448 | 193 | 3058 |
| All exempted | 6 | 13 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 27 |
| All excluded | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| No records exist | 1299 | 211 | 75 | 49 | 15 | 37 | 23 | 1709 |
| Request abandoned | 581 | 170 | 52 | 19 | 5 | 7 | 13 | 847 |
| Neither confirmed nor denied | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Total | 2379 | 2830 | 582 | 459 | 260 | 557 | 253 | 7320 |
| Section | Number of Requests | Section | Number of Requests | Section | Number of Requests |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18(2) | 0 | 22(1)(a)(i) | 35 | 23(a) | 0 |
| 19(1)(a) | 1 | 22(1)(a)(ii) | 0 | 23(b) | 0 |
| 19(1)(b) | 2 | 22(1)(a)(iii) | 0 | 24(a) | 0 |
| 19(1)(c) | 12 | 22(1)(b) | 7 | 24(b) | 0 |
| 19(1)(d) | 11 | 22(1)(c) | 0 | 25 | 0 |
| 19(1)(e) | 0 | 22(2) | 0 | 26 | 3054 |
| 19(1)(f) | 0 | 22.1 | 0 | 27 | 91 |
| 20 | 0 | 22.2 | 0 | 27.1 | 0 |
| 21 | 33 | 22.3 | 0 | 28 | 0 |
| - | 22.4 | 0 | - | ||
| Section | Number of Requests | Section | Number of Requests | Section | Number of Requests |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 69(1)(a) | 0 | 70(1) | 0 | 70(1)(d) | 0 |
| 69(1)(b) | 0 | 70(1)(a) | 1 | 70(1)(e) | 0 |
| 69.1 | 0 | 70(1)(b) | 0 | 70(1)(f) | 0 |
| - | 70(1)(c) | 0 | 70.1 | 0 | |
| Paper | Electronic | Other | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E-record | Data set | Video | Audio | ||
| 310 | 4424 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3.5 Complexity
| Number of Pages Processed | Number of Pages Disclosed | Number of Requests |
|---|---|---|
| 1539185 | 1518023 | 5608 |
| Disposition | Less Than 100 Pages Processed | 100-500 Pages Processed | 501-1000 Pages Processed | 1001-5000 Pages Processed | More Than 5000 Pages Processed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Requests | Pages Processed | Number of Requests | Pages Processed | Number of Requests | Pages Processed | Number of Requests | Pages Processed | Number of Requests | Pages Processed | |
| All Disclosed | 1344 | 25225 | 267 | 59038 | 58 | 39922 | 7 | 8549 | 0 | 0 |
| Disclosed in part | 1008 | 36760 | 1051 | 288297 | 541 | 391248 | 458 | 681901 | 0 | 0 |
| All exempted | 14 | 367 | 8 | 1523 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4503 | 0 | 0 |
| All excluded | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Request abandoned | 843 | 88 | 2 | 617 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1147 | 0 | 0 |
| Neither confirmed nor denied | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 3212 | 62440 | 1328 | 349475 | 599 | 431170 | 469 | 696100 | 0 | 0 |
| Number of Minutes Processed | Number of Minutes Disclosed | Number of Requests |
|---|---|---|
| 2298 | 6 | 18 |
| Disposition | Less than 60 Minutes Processed | 60-120 Minutes Processed | More than 120 Minutes Processed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Requests | Minutes Processed | Number of Requests | Minutes Processed | Number of Requests | Minutes Processed | |
| All disclosed | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Disclosed in part | 5 | 113 | 5 | 386 | 5 | 1297 |
| All exempted | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 480 |
| All excluded | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Request abandoned | 1 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Neither confirmed nor denied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 135 | 5 | 386 | 7 | 1777 |
| Number of Minutes Processed | Number of Minutes Disclosed | Number of Requests |
|---|---|---|
| 1310 | 0 | 9 |
| Disposition | Less than 60 Minutes Processed | 60-120 Minutes Processed | More than 120 Minutes Processed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Requests | Minutes Processed | Number of Requests | Minutes Processed | Number of Requests | Minutes Processed | |
| All disclosed | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Disclosed in part | 4 | 80 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 923 |
| All exempted | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 234 |
| All excluded | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Request abandoned | 0 | 0 | 1 | 73 | 0 | 0 |
| Neither confirmed nor denied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 80 | 1 | 73 | 4 | 1157 |
| Disposition | Consultation Required | Legal Advice Sought | Interwoven Information | Other | Total |
| All disclosed | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Disclosed in part | 1 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 20 |
| All exempted | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| All excluded | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Request abandoned | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Neither confirmed nor denied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 1 | 2 | 0 | 21 | 24 |
3.6 Closed requests
| Number of requests closed within legislated timelines | 5449 |
|---|---|
| Percentage of requests closed within legislated timelines (%) | 74.43989071 |
3.7 Deemed refusals
| Number of requests closed past the legislated timelines | Principal Reason | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interference with operations / Workload | External Consultation | Internal Consultation | Other | |
| 1871 | 1126 | 0 | 0 | 745 |
| Number of days past legislated timelines | Number of requests past legislated timeline where no extension was taken | Number of requests past legislated timeline where an extension was taken | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 to 15 days | 226 | 0 | 226 |
| 16 to 30 days | 125 | 1 | 126 |
| 31 to 60 days | 272 | 7 | 279 |
| 61 to 120 days | 295 | 29 | 324 |
| 121 to 180 days | 198 | 38 | 236 |
| 181 to 365 days | 406 | 87 | 493 |
| More than 365 days | 170 | 17 | 187 |
| Total | 1692 | 179 | 1871 |
| Translation Requests | Accepted | Refused | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| English to French | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| French to English | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Section 4: Disclosures Under Subsections 8(2) and 8(5)
| Paragraph 8(2)(e) | Paragraph 8(2)(m) | Subsection 8(5) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 154 | 67 | 67 | 288 |
Section 5: Requests for Correction of Personal Information and Notations
| Disposition for Correction Requests Received | Number |
|---|---|
| Notations attached | 0 |
| Requests for correction accepted | 0 |
| Total | 0 |
Section 6: Extensions
| - | 15(a)(i) Interference with operations | 15 (a)(ii) Consultation | 15(b) Translation purposes or conversion | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | Further review required to determine exemptions | Large volume of pages | Large volume of Requests | Documents are difficult to obtain | Cabinet ConfidenceSection (Section 70) | External | Internal | |
| Number of extensions taken | ||||||||
| 188 | 0 | 0 | 188 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| - | 15(a)(i) Interference with operations | 15 (a)(ii) Consultation | 15(b) Translation purposes or conversion | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Length of Extensions | Further review required to determine exemptions | Large volume of pages | Large volume of Requests | Documents are difficult to obtain | Cabinet ConfidenceSection (Section 70) | External | Internal | |
| 1 to 15 days | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 to 30 days | 0 | 0 | 188 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 days or greater | - | 0 | ||||||
| Total | 0 | 0 | 188 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Section 7: Consultations Received From Other Institutions and Organizations
| Consultations | Other Government of Canada Institutions | Number of Pages to Review | Other Organizations | Number of Pages to Review |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Received during the reporting period | 8 | 441 | 0 | 0 |
| Outstanding from the previous reporting period | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 441 | 0 | 0 |
| Closed during the reporting period | 6 | 392 | 0 | 0 |
| Carried over within negotiated timelines | 1 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
| Carried over beyond negotiated timelines | 1 | 36 | 0 | 0 |
| Recommendation | Number of Days Required to Complete Consultation Requests | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 to 15 Days | 16 to 30 Days | 31 to 60 Days | 61 to 120 Days | 121 to 180 Days | 181 to 365 Days | More Than 365 Days | Total | |
| Disclose entirely | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Disclose in part | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Exempt entirely | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Exclude entirely | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Consult other institution | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Other | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Recommendation | Number of days required to complete consultation Requests | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 to 15 Days | 16 to 30 Days | 31 to 60 Days | 61 to 120 Days | 121 to 180 Days | 181 to 365 Days | More Than 365 Days | Total | |
| Disclose entirely | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Disclose in part | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Exempt entirely | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Exclude entirely | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Consult other institution | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Other | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Section 8: Completion Time of Consultations on Cabinet Confidences
| Number of Days | Fewer Than 100 Pages Processed | 100-500 Pages Processed | 501-1000 Pages Processed | 1001-5000 Pages Processed | More than 5000 Pages Processed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Requests | Pages Disclosed | Number of Requests | Pages Disclosed | Number of Requests | Pages Disclosed | Number of Requests | Pages Disclosed | Number of Requests | Pages Disclosed | |
| 1 to 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 to 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 to 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 61 to 120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 121 to 180 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 181 to 365 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| More than 365 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Number of Days | Fewer Than 100 Pages Processed | 100‒500 Pages Processed | 501-1000 Pages Processed | 1001-5000 Pages Processed | More than 5000 Pages Processed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Requests | Pages Disclosed | Number of Requests | Pages Disclosed | Number of Requests | Pages Disclosed | Number of Requests | Pages Disclosed | Number of Requests | Pages Disclosed | |
| 1 to 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 to 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 to 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 61 to 120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 121 to 180 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 181 to 365 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| More than 365 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Section 9: Complaints and Investigations Notices Received
| Section 31 | Section 33 | Section 35 | Court action | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 82 | 92 | 42 | 2 | 218 |
Section 10: Privacy Impact Assessments (PIAs) and Personal Information Banks (PIBs)
| Number of PIAs completed | 2 |
| Number of PIAs modified | 0 |
| Personal Information Banks | Active | Created | Terminated | Modified |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Institution-specific | 66 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Central | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 66 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Section 11: Privacy Breaches
| Number of material privacy breaches reported to TBS | 2 |
| Number of material privacy breaches reported to OPC | 2 |
| Number of non-material privacy breaches | 236 |
Section 12: Resources Related to the Privacy Act
| Expenditures | Amount |
|---|---|
| Salaries | $5,770,109 |
| Overtime | $3,599 |
| Goods and Services | $1,031,884 |
|
$718,415 |
|
$313,469 |
| Total | $6,805,592 |
| Resources | Person Years Dedicated to Privacy Activities |
|---|---|
| Full-time employees | 67.082 |
| Part-time and casual employees | 3.045 |
| Regional staff | 0.000 |
| Consultants and agency personnel | 4.500 |
| Students | 0.164 |
| Total | 74.791 |
Note: Enter values to three decimal places.
Annex C: Supplemental Statistical Report on the Access to Information Act and Privacy Act for 2024-2025
Name of institution:Department of National Defence
Reporting period: 2024-04-01 to 2025-03-31
Section 1: Open Requests and Complaints Under the Access to Information Act
| Fiscal Year Open Requests Were Received | Open Requests that are Within Legislated Timelines as of March 31, 2025 | Open Requests that are Beyond Legislated Timelines as of March 31, 2025 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Received in 2024-25 | 240 | 874 | 1114 |
| Received in 2023-24 | 3 | 525 | 528 |
| Received in 2022-23 | 1 | 284 | 285 |
| Received in 2021-22 | 1 | 184 | 185 |
| Received in 2020-21 | 0 | 95 | 95 |
| Received in 2019-20 | 0 | 80 | 80 |
| Received in 2018-19 | 0 | 22 | 22 |
| Received in 2017-18 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Received in 2016-17 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Received in 2015-16 or earlier | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Total | 245 | 2069 | 2314 |
| Fiscal Year Open Complaints Were Received by Institution | Number of Open Complaints |
|---|---|
| Received in 2024-25 | 132 |
| Received in 2023-24 | 4 |
| Received in 2022-23 | 0 |
| Received in 2021-22 | 0 |
| Received in 2020-21 | 2 |
| Received in 2019-20 | 1 |
| Received in 2018-19 | 0 |
| Received in 2017-18 | 0 |
| Received in 2016-17 | 0 |
| Received in 2015-16 or earlier | 2 |
| Total | 141 |
Section 2: Open Requests and Complaints Under the Privacy Act
| Fiscal Year Open Requests Were Received | Open Requests that are Within Legislated Timelines as of March 31, 2025 | Open Requests that are Beyond Legislated Timelines as of March 31, 2025 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Received in 2024-25 | 467 | 499 | 966 |
| Received in 2023-24 | 0 | 86 | 86 |
| Received in 2022-23 | 0 | 14 | 14 |
| Received in 2021-22 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Received in 2020-21 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Received in 2019-20 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Received in 2018-19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Received in 2017-18 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Received in 2016-17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Received in 2015-16 or earlier | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 467 | 599 | 1066 |
| Fiscal Year Open Complaints Were Received by Institution | Number of Open Complaints |
|---|---|
| Received in 2024-25 | 25 |
| Received in 2023-24 | 9 |
| Received in 2022-23 | 7 |
| Received in 2021-22 | 0 |
| Received in 2020-21 | 2 |
| Received in 2019-20 | 2 |
| Received in 2018-19 | 0 |
| Received in 2017-18 | 0 |
| Received in 2016-17 | 0 |
| Received in 2015-16 or earlier | 0 |
| Total | 45 |
Section 3: Social Insurance Number
| Has your institution begun a new collection or a new consistent use of the SIN in 2024-25? | Yes |
|---|
Section 4: Universal Access under the Privacy Act
| How many requests were received from foreign nationals outside of Canada in 2024-25? | 15 |
|---|
